Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Reflections on EDLD 5352 Instructional Leadership: The Technology Link


Reflections on EDLD 5352 Instructional Leadership: The Technology Link

When this class began I was intrigued to find out that it dealt with integrating technology into the classroom. The school where I teach is in the process of putting hand-held PDA’s in the hands of all students and faculty. More specifically everyone will be obtaining Apple i-Touches. The concern for many teachers is how can these devices be used to educate, instead of only being toys for the students. I viewed this course as a possible great resource for me, not only for future principal positions but, as a current educator being thrust into a technology explosion in education.

As I finish the course I believe it did serve as an adequate primer for technology integration in education. Through the various readings and assignments I was able to envision ways to use technology to advance the curriculum of schools. The class also brought to the fore-front some of the many hurdles that could hinder the process. Most are problems that are more likely to be addressed by administrators.


As the course did serve as an excellent introduction to how technology can and will be used in classrooms in the near future, it also left me as a student knowing that I must continue my quest for development in this area. This is probably the most relevant course, in this Lamar Masters Education process, to what I am currently doing on a daily basis. As a classroom teacher I am constantly searching for new ways to integrate technology into my classes. This course has reinforced the need to integrate technology into the classroom that my local school district is developing. As a veteran of the education system I, as well as all long-time educators, have seen a plethora of new innovations to make education better. This push for technology integration may appear to be just one of those fads to some, but with the reinforcement of hearing it from a respected source (the Lamar Education Department) I realize technology led curriculum is not another passing fad , but the future of education in the 21st Century.


As I reflect on this course I was hoping I could become more comfortable with the use of podcasting. This is an area that I believe can be of great help to educators. As more students become “plugged in” to the internet the number of ways to keep them engaged to the curriculum grows. Podcasting appears to be one of the most intriguing ways to do that. Several of the course articles discussed podcasting and it was mentioned during lectures, but I would like to have learned more. I understand that having each student create podcasts for the course currently may not be workable, but maybe the process could be explained and educational podcasts researched. Perhaps as this course evolves, the use of podcasting can be integrated into it much as the creation of a blog was.


Most of the course assignments were very challenging. The weekly assignments which always included multiple readings requiring personal reflection was often demanding. Some of the papers were quite lengthy and it becomes hard to find adequate time as a full time teacher and coach. Some times it was late in the week before I was able to post my quotes and reflections. I noticed there were others in my group with the same problem. This can cause a problem for others as they are waiting to reflect on someone else’s post.

The most challenging assignments were the ones that came at the beginning of the course when we were required to interview a principal, a member of the campus improvement committee, teachers, and students. This would be difficult to accomplish in five days at any time during a busy school year, but this assignment fell around the Thanksgiving holidays and it was very difficult tracking everyone down. I was eventually able to complete the assignment but it was not as complete as it could have been.

As technology becomes integrated into every level of our education system the possibilities of more students becoming meaningfully involved in their own education is exciting. However, this course has helped me to look at this technology integration from an educational leader’s perspective. As the leader of a campus where technology is being integrated there will be more and more need for principals to understand not only the educational possibilities but also the additional problems that may be created. These problems will range from dealing with the distractions of new technology to possibly new safety issues. There will be problems arise that we do not even understand because of our limitations of technology expertise. It will be imperative that as an educational leader of a campus I stay aware of new trends and innovations. It will be of even more importance to have a staff from campus technology facilitators to teachers who are properly developed in technology.

As with all technology, blogging has grown exponentially in the last two years. The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines a blog as- a Web site that contains an online personal journal with reflections, comments, and often hyperlinks provided by the writer. A blog used in the educational setting can be used for so many things that could be beneficial for students, teachers, and all stakeholders of the school. For the students, researching blogs allows a student to not only read about information but to interact with the author by making comments and even having the author or other readers of the blog responding to their comments. This can allow a person to actually discuss a question with an expert.
For teachers, blogs can be an invaluable tool for researching their field of teaching or finding new and exciting ways to express their curriculum. Blogs can also be an excellent tool to keep students and parents in tune with what is going on in a teacher’s classroom daily.

While blogging is an excellent form of communication and research it also presents itself as a possible tool for problems. The thing that makes blogs so useful and easy is the same thing that can cause problems. Anyone can create a blog. While this is a good thing, it means someone can easily put out propaganda or mistruths about something or someone on the world-wide web. People tend to be much braver when speaking in untruths or slander when they are protected by a keyboard and computer screen. It could also be a problem if schools or teachers use blogs to give stakeholders important information and passwords are stolen to release incorrect information. When schools use official blogs to disseminate information security must be taken very seriously.

Blogs and wikis will continue to grow in importance in the field of education. As educational leaders we must not only keep ourselves up to date on the beneficial uses of these tools, but also be aware of the special problems that this new technology can bring.

As a future educational leader I foresee using blogs as an additional way to effectively communicate with all school district stakeholders more effectively. Students are comfortable communicating over the internet but their parents may not be. As a leader of a school one of the most important aspects of the job is effective communication. A blog will allow the school district to not only post information but also allow stakeholders the opportunity to comment on it in real time. It will be necessary to educate everyone who is interested in the blog. Students, parents, community members, etc. should be given ample opportunities to train in the proper use of a blog or wiki. This effort in itself will allow the administrator to have a more personal relationship with parents and any other interested school stakeholders. I would recommend a training session for these stakeholders be held at least once per six-weeks.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Technology Action Plan

Technology Action Plan

District Technology Data Gathering Processes
The District will use any and all data gathering sources that it feels is necessary to give its stakeholders the information required to make decisions regarding implementing useful technology in all curriculums in the district. The data gathering sources are currently the School Technology and Readiness report (STaR), the Texas Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS), Project Tomorrow, the Annually Yearly Progress report (AYP), and evaluation of district and campus TAKS results. The district will also develop its own system to evaluate the technology accomplishments and needs in the district. This evaluation system will be used in conjunction with the current methods of data gathering to develop a district wide examination of technology use. A technology committee will be established to make recommendations regarding this evaluation process, as well as making other technology recommendations for the district. The technology committee will consist of teachers, administrators, students, community members, and parents.

District Technology Organization
As the District Organizational Chart shows, the Superintendent of the district will employ as many sources as possible to make proper recommendations to the school board regarding technology requirements of the district. Included in these sources will be the collaborative technology committee and The District Site Based Committees. The school board will take the information and recommendations of the superintendent to make informed decisions. The school board will employ the use of legal consultants as it feels necessary to help make decisions in implementing new and exciting technologies in the classrooms. The Principal will lead his campus in a manner that will always foster new and exciting ways for students and teachers to learn. This will include the integration of all technology as provided by the district. With feedback from teachers and technology consultants the principals of all campuses will develop and research needed professional development to incorporate technology into every classroom in a meaningful and useful way. The principal will use as a resource for campus information gathering the Teacher – Student Committee. This committee which will be a collaborative effort between students and teachers will provide the building principal with feedback as well as suggestions for new technology ideas. The teachers have the responsibility to integrate their curriculum with technology that will reach all students and improve the learning process for everyone. All teachers are expected to use professional development to prepare themselves and their students to use 21st Century technology in all areas of life. The students of the district will be immersed in the technology that surrounds them in the 21st Century world. The students of the district will have a fulfilling technology integrated learning atmosphere. They will be prepared for a global world when they graduate.

Technology Professional Development
Professional development as it pertains to technology will be four-fold. 1. The employee will be required to attend 4 professional developments that pertain to technology needs in their classroom sometime during the year. 2. The employee will receive at least three online professional development trainings as set forth by the principal of each campus. These may be done at home anytime during the year. 3. The employees will be required to have two days of campus professional development as outlined and prepared by district leadership. These two days will be during the week and the school district will provide substitute teachers. 4. Each employee will be required to attend a district wide technology meeting. This meeting will be used to explain and answer questions regarding new technologies of the district. The meeting will also be used to develop and reinforce the campus and district-wide technology committees.

Evaluation of Technology Action Plan
The Action plan as outlined will be evaluated by many avenues. The School Technology and Readiness report (STaR), the Texas Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS), Project Tomorrow, the Annually Yearly Progress report (AYP), and evaluation of district and campus TAKS results will continue to be evaluated for improvement in all areas. The districts own evaluation process as set forth by the local school board will also be used. The district will also rely on data such ACT and SAT scores, Graduation / Drop-out rates, extracurricular participation and success, and college graduation rates of district students.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

District Technology Organizational Chart

Site Based Committe and Technology Committees These committees will have the charge of researching various technology related details and ideas to accomplish school and state established goals.

Superintendent The Superintendent will direct the district in a manner that will establish goals that are building toward integrating technology in all levels of the district.

Legal Consultants The district will employ lawyers and legal consultants to provide legal leadership in all aspects of the integration of technology in the district.

Technology Consultants The district will provide sufficient technology support so students, teachers, and all stakeholders can be successful in a district completely immersed in technology.

Principal The Principal will lead his campus in a manner that will always foster new and exciting ways for students and teachers to learn. This will include the integration of all technology as provided by the district.

Teacher and Student Committees These committees which will be a collaberative effort between students and teachers will provide the building principal with feedback as well as suggestions for new technology ideas.

Teachers The teachers have the responsibility to integrate their curriculum with technology that will reach all students and improve learning for everyone.

Students The students of the district will have a fulfilling technology integrated learning atmosphere. They will be prepared for a global world when they graduate .

Friday, November 27, 2009

Texas STaR Chart Presentation

Presentation prepared for Lamar University EDLD 5352

STaR Chart - Teaching and Learning

The STaR Chart is an evaluation instrument used by the state of Texas education system to monitor and evaluate the level of progress schools are obtaining developing technology in their education environments. STaR is an acronym for School Technology And Readiness. The evaluation(chart) is broken into four categories: Teaching and Learning, Educator Preparation, Administration and Support, and Infrastructure.
I will will discuss Teaching and Learning in this blog as it pertains to the Jim Ned High School campus data as well as statewide data. The campus is classified as Developing Tech. Most odf the six areas surveyed were given 2's as answers. A 2 is a developing tech . As one of the teachers that took the STar chart assessment I think I can discuss these results with some expertise. I would say that the results are a fair representation of my personal results. I think I can speak for many of my fellow educators when I say that there is a frustration revolving around the use of technology. As we see much progress on our campus with infrastructure with better servers and school wide WAN systems, teachers feel as though they are ill prepared to use the technology with the amount of training they have received to this date. There is definitely a push by our administration to use technology in the classroom, and I and other teachers fully embrace this idea. The problem becomes to find professional development that will provide teachers with the hands on information they need to actually use the technology to assimilate their curriculum. It is my opinion that right now the technology infrastructures are beyond our abilities to use. One example is that we have school wide wireless Internet connections but we also have filters that do not allow teachers to access websites that would be beneficial. This is one of the problems that must be solved so educators do not become disenchanted with the process. People who teach classes at Service Centers have never used these technologies in the actual classrooms, so it is hard for teachers to trust such training. We must find a way for Advanced and Target Tech level teachers to collaborate with early and developing tech teachers such as myself.

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Pre-K Technology Applications TEKS

At the end of a students prekindergarten years the following are the outcomes expected of the students as far as technology applications are concerned:
The child can open and navigate through software programs designed to enhance development of appropriate concepts.
The child use a variety of computer input devices such as mouse, keyboard, voice/sound recorder,touch screen, C.D ROM.
The child operates voice/sound recorders and touch screens.
The child uses software applications to create and express own ideas.
The child recognizes that information is accessible through the use of technology.

The technology applications TEKS are designed to be a "SPIRALING CURRICULUM". A spiraling curriculum is an educational method of building upon knowledge by revisiting a concept using different forms of representation in a continuing cycle and at a higher level of complexity.
The Texas TEKS for technology applications constantly allows the student a reinforcing curriculum such as building upon the type of software the student is engaged with and continually reinforcing the ethical practices of using internet resources.